Leadership mentoring session

In the current rapid business landscape characterized by digital upheaval, changing global markets, and shifting workforce demands, companies struggle with the optimal way to cultivate their leaders. Two common methods are executive mentoring and leadership training, both providing distinct advantages and effects. Nonetheless, identifying which method or combination is most effective relies on an organization’s culture, leadership requirements, and strategic objectives.


This detailed guide examines the distinctions between executive mentoring and leadership training, informed by client perspectives highlighting a developmental path where internal mentoring aids emerging leaders, advancing to external mentoring and coaching for senior executives.

Grasping Mentoring and Leadership Development

Leadership Training consists of organized educational initiatives aimed at developing particular leadership skills like communication, strategic analysis, decision-making, and team supervision. These programs generally utilize workshops, seminars, e-learning, or simulations and are frequently conducted in cohort formats. Their goal is to quickly enhance the skills of teams, guaranteeing uniformity and adherence throughout leadership levels.


Mentoring is a private, customized relationship involving an experienced mentor, usually a senior or ex-executive, and a mentee. In contrast to the organized nature of training, mentoring’s flexible and relational strategy fosters ongoing development, emphasizing career progression, cultural adaptation, network expansion, and balance between work and personal life. Mentoring discussions offer detailed, experience-driven advice that tackles intricate leadership issues and changes.

Essential Differences in Development Approach

Emphasis

  • Training is aimed at obtaining specific skills and knowledge; mentoring encompasses strategic career advice and the growth of emotional intelligence.

Format

  • Training is structured, directive, and typically conducted in group environments. Mentoring depends on individualized, dynamic conversations customized to the changing needs of the mentee.

Confidentiality

  • Mentoring emphasizes robust confidentiality, establishing a secure environment for mentees to discuss vulnerabilities and delicate matters.

Evaluation

  • Training results are measured using assessments and key performance indicators. The success of mentoring can be seen in employee retention, preparedness for leadership roles, and increased engagement among employees.

Advantages of Leadership Training

  • Leadership development programs provide essential foundations for an organization’s leadership.

Skill Enhancement

  • Offers essential hard and soft skills necessary for successful leadership via established curricula.

Consistency

  • Ensures leadership actions are in harmony with the organization’s objectives and guidelines.

Scalability

  • Facilitates quick skill enhancement among large groups of employees.

Quick Benefits

  • Organizations note enhancements in project management, communication, and operational efficiency soon after training programs.

Advantages of Mentoring

  • Mentoring provides significant, unique benefits:

Tailored Career Approach

  • Mentees get customized support that matches both personal and company objectives.

Cultural Integration

  • Mentoring speeds up acclimatization, assisting new leaders to flourish in the company culture.

Network Growth

  • Providing emerging leaders with connections to key contacts.

Essential Retention Instrument

  • Mentoring is associated with increased loyalty and retention levels in high-potential employees.

Work-Life Integration

  • Provides comprehensive assistance to align leadership demands with personal health.

Trust and Privacy

  • The confidential aspect of mentoring enables the discussion of delicate subjects frequently steered clear of in other settings.

When to Utilize Leadership Training Compared to Mentoring?

Choose Leadership Training to

  • Integrate large teams requiring essential abilities.
  • Tackle identified skill deficiencies for quick enhancement of performance.
  • Assist with organizational transformations that necessitate synchronized leadership transitions.
  • Provide tangible training outcomes swiftly.

Choose Mentoring when

  • Equipping leaders for major career changes or advancements.
  • Assisting individuals with intricate, tailored growth requirements.
  • Developing succession plans and overseeing diversity programs.
  • Establishing secure spaces for honest and secretive discussions among leaders.

Enhancing Influence: Merging Mentorship and Education

The most successful leadership development combines formal training in essential skills with mentoring for ongoing advancement. For instance, organizations frequently implement training to create foundational skills and then enhance it with mentoring to address complicated issues and expedite strategic leadership growth. Hybrid models that combine these methods provide advantages, reducing leadership burnout and promoting agility.

Challenges to Avoid

  • Relying solely on training may result in leaders who are skilled technically but unable to adapt.
  • Depending only on mentoring can result in important skills gaps not being filled and may have difficulty expanding throughout organizations.
  • Ineffective mentoring structures decrease accountability and lessen developmental effectiveness.

Selecting the Appropriate Method: A Plan for Organizations

Achievement relies on an accurate evaluation of organizational requirements, leadership development, and culture. Feedback from leaders is crucial in aligning development strategies with actual challenges. Open discussion regarding the importance of mentoring and training promotes engagement and enhances investment outcomes.

Leadership and mentoring program

Conclusion

As leadership demands become more complex, no single method is adequate. Organizations need to adopt a combined leadership development approach, utilizing mentoring for profound personal and strategic advancement while employing training to enhance vital leadership skills on a larger scale. This approach will foster forward-thinking, adaptable leaders prepared to navigate their organizations through present and upcoming difficulties.

Organizations prepared to safeguard their leadership pipelines will discover that a deliberate mix of mentoring and training is essential for unleashing their teams’ complete capabilities.

Connect with the Executive Springboard Team to Elevate Your Leadership Journey Through Expert Mentoring!

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Mentoring involves a tailored, private partnership aimed at enhancing long-term career and leadership development, tackling objectives like cultural alignment, networking, strategic reasoning, and work-life balance. Leadership training is generally a structured initiative focused on quickly developing specific skills, knowledge, and behaviors essential for immediate job performance and alignment within the organization.
Mentoring is perfect when leaders encounter changes, require detailed career advice, or need assistance with aspects such as succession planning, organizational culture, or strategic networking. It is most effective for personal growth and sustained influence, rather than quick collective skill enhancement.
Leadership training provides tangible, immediate benefits: enhanced communication, more refined managerial abilities, and greater uniformity among teams. Mentoring enhances wider objectives, promoting greater retention, increased engagement, and more robust, future-ready leaders by utilizing mentor insights and private conversations.
Certainly! Combining both approaches is considered the best practice in the industry. Various organizations start with leadership training to build skills, subsequently adding mentoring to enhance learning, tackle practical challenges, and offer continuous career and leadership assistance for high potentials and senior leaders
Executive Leadership Mentoring

In the fast-paced and ever-changing landscape of business leadership, possessing the proper support network is crucial for ongoing achievement. Executive leadership mentoring has become a formidable, tailored developmental approach that aids senior leaders in managing the intricate challenges of business expansion, organizational change, and their own leadership development. In contrast to conventional training or coaching, mentoring provides a prolonged, private collaboration that enables leaders to contemplate, learn, and evolve more profoundly.

This in-depth guide examines the concept of executive leadership mentoring, its advantages for leaders and organizations, and the best practices that business leaders should implement to enhance its effectiveness.

What does Executive Leadership Mentoring mean?

Executive leadership mentoring is a customized connection between experienced senior leaders, frequently skilled mentors, and executives looking for advice, insights, and growth. This connection goes beyond mere transactional guidance or skill development; it emphasizes comprehensive leadership advancement, strategic choices, cultural coherence, and individual wellness.

In contrast to mentoring programs designed for junior or budding talent, executive mentoring focuses on the particular challenges encountered by C-suite leaders, presidents, and senior management. It provides mentees the advantage of an experienced advisor who grasps the technical and emotional intricacies of managing large, complex organizations.

Mentoring versus Coaching versus Training

Although these terms are occasionally used as synonyms, executive mentoring is different from coaching and structured training:
  • Mentoring is a collaborative, extended relationship centered on career guidance, cultural adaptation, strategic advice, and networking. It highlights trust and confidentiality, enabling open discussions about weaknesses, challenges, and goals.
  • Coaching is usually more focused on performance and specific goals, seeking to enhance particular skills or behavioral modifications within a set timeframe.
  • Training generally consists of organized, formalized programs aimed at developing particular skills or knowledge within groups or cohorts.

Advantages of Mentoring in Executive Leadership

Customized Tactical Advice

Each organization and leader is distinctive. Mentors offer personalized guidance aligned with the mentee’s position, organizational culture, industry obstacles, and development path. This customization guarantees that leaders obtain insights that are contextually relevant instead of standard leadership ideas.

Improved Emotional Intelligence and Self-Awareness

Mentoring provides a secure environment for leaders to examine blind spots, emotional triggers, and leadership deficiencies without the worry of being judged. This vulnerability enhances emotional intelligence, an essential quality associated with effective leadership in unpredictable situations.

Enhanced Decision-Making and Issue Resolution

By engaging in continuous conversation and introspection, mentees enhance their critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Mentors assist leaders in viewing problems from various angles, predicting outcomes, and handling complexity efficiently.

Career and Personal Harmony

Executive mentors frequently promote overall well-being, acknowledging that work-life balance and individual resilience significantly influence leadership performance. They advise on handling stress, developing lasting habits, and aligning personal values with career responsibilities.

Enhanced Connections and Exposure

Mentors connect mentees to important professional networks and assist them in broadening their impact both within and outside their organizations. This access may fast-track career growth and create pathways to new possibilities.

Succession Planning and Talent Growth

Organizations that utilize executive mentoring create more robust leadership pipelines. Mentoring enhances retention and preparedness in high-potential leaders, guaranteeing leadership continuity during crucial transitions.

How Does Executive Leadership Mentoring Work?

Executive mentoring initiatives typically start with a thoughtful pairing of mentors and mentees, considering factors like experience, industry expertise, character, and growth requirements. This alignment process is essential, compatibility fosters trust and transparency.

Mentoring interactions generally consist of

Routine Gatherings

Monthly or quarterly private conversations held either online or face-to-face.

Goal Setting

Collaboratively established developmental objectives that reflect both organizational strategy and individual ambitions.

Reflection and Feedback

Transparent, sincere dialogues that question beliefs and encourage development.

Responsibility

Mentors ensure leaders are accountable while promoting experimentation and learning from failures.

Extended Collaboration

In contrast to brief training or coaching sessions, mentoring connections typically endure for 1-3 years or longer, ensuring consistency throughout leadership transitions.

Best Strategies for Successful Executive Mentoring

Confidentiality is Essential

Safeguarding privacy builds trust and motivates leaders to discuss sensitive matters and shortcomings. The confidentiality agreement typically ensures that mentoring discussions stay private between the mentor and mentee, enhancing transparent communication.

Concentrate on the Complete Leader

Cover both personal and professional aspects. The development of sustainable leadership relies on health, mindset, values, and emotional wellness just as much as on skills and knowledge.

Foster Openness and Genuineness

Mentors demonstrate vulnerability by discussing their own struggles and insights. This transparency inspires mentees to be genuine, resulting in richer insights and significant advancements.

Incorporate Mentoring into Organizational Objectives

While mentoring is private, it ought to align with wider leadership initiatives and organizational goals. Frequent check-ins with HR or leadership sponsors assist in aligning expectations while maintaining privacy.

Deliver Training and Support for Mentors

To enhance mentor efficacy, organizations ought to prioritize mentor training initiatives that focus on active listening, posing impactful questions, providing constructive feedback, and upholding boundaries.

Success Stories of Executive Mentoring

Many international firms indicate tangible advantages from their investment in executive mentoring, such as increased retention rates, quicker leader development, and an improved organizational culture. For instance, mentoring initiatives at Fortune 500 companies have assisted CEOs and top executives in adjusting to digital transformation obstacles, managing mergers, and fostering more inclusive environments.

Executives engaged in mentoring report heightened confidence, a broader viewpoint, and a feeling of reduced isolation, frequently referred to as the “lonely at the top” syndrome, as key benefits from the experience.

Selecting an Executive Mentoring Program

  • Organizations looking into mentoring programs ought to:
  • Evaluate requirements for leadership and its development stage.
  • Establish specific goals and measurements
  • Obtain executive support and commitment
  • Create intentional mentoring pairing procedures
  • Integrate mentoring with additional leadership development resources (training, coaching)
  • Assess program effectiveness and consistently enhance it.
Executive Leadership Mentoring

Final Thoughts

Executive leadership mentoring transcends mere development; it has become a strategic necessity in the rapidly evolving business landscape. Through cultivating reliable, confidential collaborations, mentoring provides senior leaders with the insight, emotional awareness, and connections essential for managing complexity and leading effectively. When incorporated into a cohesive leadership approach, mentoring fosters lasting organizational success and cultivates resilient, forward-thinking leadership teams prepared to tackle upcoming challenges.


For business leaders aiming to excel in times of disruption and change, Executive Springboard  mentoring serves not only as a resource but also as a competitive edge and a route to enduring success.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

An informal, long-term relationship between a rising talent and a senior leader. Focuses on broader career development goals and career planning. Mentors share their personal experiences and unique insights as part of the guidance.

Leadership mentoring benefits the mentee by creating opportunities to learn from experienced leaders. It gives mentees a place to ask questions, work on their skills, and get valuable feedback. It can also help them create a roadmap to reach their career goals.

Contemplation is the first sage of a mentoring relationship between the mentor and mentee. While no two relationships develop in the exact same way, mentoring relationships tend to follow five stages: contemplation, initiation, growth and maintenance, decline and dissolution, and redefinition.

Too many people enter mentoring relationships believing they are a good thing to do, without knowing how to make the most of the experience. As you prepare for conversations with your mentee, you need to think about the four Ps: purpose, preparation, participation, and plan.

Executive Springboard mentor guiding leader

In the current challenging corporate landscape, thriving companies recognize that investing in leadership training is vital for growth, innovation, and employee retention. Executive mentoring and executive coaching are two highly effective methods that are frequently categorized together; however, they fulfill different objectives, utilize varying techniques, and offer specific advantages. Grasping the differences between these approaches is crucial for maximizing their effectiveness for both individuals and organizational strategy.

What is Executive Coaching?

Executive coaching is a professional, short- to medium-term partnership focused on particular performance challenges or developmental objectives for senior leaders and high-potential professionals. Led by a skilled coach, coaching emphasizes future goals and practical actions. The average coach employs a methodical approach that includes routine, private one-on-one meetings, with each meeting aimed at unlocking potential, enhancing performance, and speeding up skill development.

Essential features of executive coaching

  • – Focused on achieving goals, coaching aims to assist executives in addressing significant immediate challenges with confidence and skill.
  • – Coaches frequently utilize feedback from instruments such as 360-degree evaluations to establish coaching goals.
  • – The approach highlights difficulty and assistance. Coaches serve as facilitators, posing impactful questions, promoting reflection, and assisting leaders in discovering their own solutions instead of giving direct guidance.
  • – Sessions occur regularly, are concentrated, and typically span three to six months, with opportunities for continued collaboration on emerging issues as they develop.

Executive coaching is most appropriate for

  • – Leaders experiencing transitions, like advancements or new strategic objectives.
  • – Leaders aiming to enhance specific skills or tackle current organizational issues.
  • – Organizations focused on quantifiable results within strict deadlines.,/li>

What Is Executive Mentoring?

Executive mentoring, conversely, provides a wider, more enduring outlook on the growth of leadership skills. It connects a seasoned and typically more knowledgeable leader, the mentor, with a less experienced executive, the mentee. In contrast to the focused methods of coaching, mentoring takes a comprehensive approach, frequently encompassing personal goals, career aspirations, workplace dynamics, and aspects of life beyond the job.

Characteristics of executive mentoring consist of:

  •  The connection develops naturally, emphasizing the mentee’s holistic development, knowledge gain, and wider professional path.
  • Mentors recount stories, insights gained, and counsel based on personal experience, creating a relationship that is both instructive and supportive.
  • -Mentoring lasts a minimum of eight months and may continue for several years.
  • Mentoring is casual, founded on trust, confidentiality, and mutual respect.

Mentoring works best for:

  • Executives who want to develop judgment, gain organizational context, and build long-term resilience.
  • Organizations building a succession pipeline, fostering inclusive cultures, or supporting new leaders beyond initial training.

Key Distinctions: Coaching vs. Mentoring

Focus & Intent

  • Coaching focuses on particular skills or behaviors for prompt enhancement, frequently aligned with quantifiable goals or urgent business requirements.
  • Mentoring emphasizes comprehensive professional development and future career path, sharing insights and maneuvering through intricate organizational dynamics.

Structure of Relationships

  • Coaching is more time-limited, and focused on results.
  • Mentoring is extended, and generally wide-ranging.

Function of the Advisor

    • A coach serves as a facilitator or catalyst for self-directed change, steering clear of direct advice while encouraging the coachee’s strengths and solutions to emerge
    • A mentor serves as a guide, confidant, and advisor, sharing insights and life experiences drawn from their own professional path.

Rate & Length

      • Coaching consists of consistent, brief sessions (30-90 minutes, weekly or biweekly) over a span of several months.
      • Mentoring consists of twice monthly meetings, with the connection often lasting for eight months or longer.

Substance of Engagements

Coaching:

Emphasizes specific objectives, modification of behavior, enhancement of performance.  May include reporting back to the organization on executive’s progress.

Mentoring:

Focuses on larger goals, cultural adjustment, building networks, career guidance, and complete privacy of the mentoring relationship, ensuring personal and career issues are explored openly, without reporting or sharing engagement details with the organization. Any evaluation of executive’s progress almost always comes from the executive themselves or from feedback gained by stakeholders, not from the mentor

The Intersection of Executive Coaching and Mentoring

Regardless of their distinctions, executive mentoring and coaching possess various similarities:

      • Both involve confidential interactions founded on trust, respect, and transparent communication
      • Each serves as a trigger for self-reflection and education
      • Both aid in leadership growth and organizational succession planning.

      Combining Coaching and Mentoring for Maximum Growth

      Top organizations integrate mentoring and coaching to create a strong development ecosystem. A leader may hire a coach to hasten a significant change while simultaneously fostering a lasting mentorship for career durability and more profound understanding. The integration guarantees both instant advancement and ongoing personal and career development.

      Selecting Between Coaching and Mentoring

      Executive coaching is perfect for:

          • Addressing particular leadership issues, changes in roles, or immediate business goals.
          • Cultivating specific skills like communication, decision-making, or strategic thinking.
          • Companies looking for rapid, quantifiable returns on investment.

      Executive mentoring is most suitable for:

        • – Nurturing organizational culture and sharing institutional knowledge.
        • – Assisting leadership pathways, particularly for developing or high-potential leaders.
        • – Creating networks, fostering resilience, and cultivating comprehensive executive judgment.
mentors

Conclusion: The Importance of Each Method

Organizations that recognize the unique advantages of executive coaching and mentoring develop stronger, more effective leadership teams. By selecting the appropriate strategy or, preferably, integrating both organizations can guarantee that their best employees flourish not only presently but throughout their career span.


Executive coaching and mentoring are each effective independently, but when combined, they create a holistic leadership development approach that prepares organizations for a transforming environment.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Compared to an executive coach, your mentor may meet with you less frequently. But mentoring sessions are normally longer and more far-ranging than coaching sessions. Because its scope is considerably broader than executive coaching, a mentoring relationship typically lasts at least nine or ten months.​​
An informal, long-term relationship between a rising talent and a senior leader. Focuses on broader career development goals and career planning. Mentors share their personal experiences and unique insights as part of the guidance.​​
The foundational 4 C’s of mentorship are Communication, Connection, Clarity, and Commitment. These core principles underpin every successful mentor program and serve as the framework for growth, learning, and development.​​
The key roles of a mentor are to provide guidance and advice, act as a role model, offer constructive feedback, build the mentee’s confidence, help set and track goals, facilitate networking, and serve as an accountability partner. These roles focus on transferring knowledge, supporting personal and professional growth, and empowering the mentee to become more independent.
Executive Springboard LLC

By guest blogger and certified life coach, Elena Stewart

You don’t need to dominate conversations to guide a team. Leadership isn’t about volume, it’s about direction, consistency, and how others feel in your presence. If you’re naturally inward-facing, your strengths aren’t barriers, they’re levers waiting to be pulled. The challenge isn’t changing your personality. It’s learning how to apply it in ways that move people. What follows are grounded, tactical ways introverts lead effectively, and why those who observe before acting often win.

Keys to Make Your Introvert Traits into Strength

Reflection Leads to Better Decisions

Fast thinkers often miss slow truths. You tend to notice patterns, absorb nuance, and draw from previous experiences before reacting. That pause gives you an edge in leadership, especially when navigating pressure. Instead of pushing through noise, you process it, align with your values, and move forward with purpose. Leaders who establish this rhythm often outperform those who rely on reaction-based management every time. When you prioritize space to make smarter decisions through reflection, you’re not hesitating, you’re sharpening.

Creating Autonomy Without Losing Accountability

Introverts rarely want someone watching their every move, and that makes you less likely to do it to others. Delegation doesn’t mean disconnection, though. It means you’re intentional with your involvement: setting expectations, checking progress, and creating space. People perform better when they own their work, not when they’re managed to death. And you’re probably more comfortable designing systems than hovering anyway. That’s exactly why leaders who avoid micromanagement often create more sustainable momentum.

Why Listening Increases Leadership Credibility

Introverted leaders often communicate less frequently, but with more impact. Listening becomes a strategy, not just a courtesy. When your team knows you’ll take their input seriously, they’re more likely to bring you something worth hearing. You’re not deferring, you’re gathering intel, mapping the room, and calibrating your response. It’s not always the person who talks first who moves the room, it’s the one who hears what everyone else misses. Great leadership often begins when you lead by listening, not just speaking.

Formal Learning Supports Confident Leadership

You don’t have to learn everything in the field. Structured education offers a quieter, more focused way to develop leadership skills that don’t rely on charisma. Programs like MBAs offer frameworks for decision-making, team dynamics, finance, and communication — giving you tools that fit your style. Instead of winging it, you build confidence from a base of clarity and competence. Many introverts thrive when there’s a plan, a model, and time to think. The benefits of an MBA degree aren’t just about credentials, they’re about scaffolding your next step.

Structuring Hybrid Teams for Clarity and Trust

Remote days can recharge you. In-person days can test you. Leading a hybrid team means designing workflows that don’t drain the quietest people in the room, including you. Asynchronous communication, clear expectations, and rotating touchpoints help create a culture that doesn’t require everyone to perform socially every day. You can’t fake availability, but you can design presence. Leaders who navigate hybrid leadership with flexibility create systems that respect energy, not just visibility.

Journal and Assess as Part of Your Growth

You don’t need a manager to tell you how you’re improving, you need a reliable record of your own growth. Quiet leaders often benefit from maintaining personal leadership journals where weekly reflections, team notes, and self-assessments live in one place. Over time, this becomes a private mirror; tracking not just what you did, but how you responded. Saving these notes as PDFs helps preserve structure, accessibility, and long-term organization. If your materials are scattered, use a PDF converter to consolidate them into something you can revisit and refine.

Designing Team Roles That Support Shared Ownership

You don’t have to be the center of every decision to be in control. In fact, your strength may be pulling others into leadership roles that balance your focus. Delegating visibility can let you stay strategic without becoming invisible. When you promote co-leadership, you create resilience: people feel invested, and the team doesn’t stall when you’re not in every meeting. Quiet influence is still influence. Strong leaders often empower co‑leadership within their team without the need to hold all the control.

Executive Springboard LLC , Maryland

Final Thoughts

Leading quietly isn’t a compromise, it’s a choice. Introverted traits don’t need to be corrected, just directed. You’re not here to perform leadership; you’re here to build something sustainable. Reflective action, thoughtful delegation, and smart communication are what move teams forward. The trick isn’t to become louder, it’s to become clearer, steadier, and more grounded in what works for you. 

Unlock the potential of your top talent with Executive Springboard and connect them with seasoned mentors who accelerate leadership success and drive organizational growth.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

They are comfortable with silence and don't feel the need to constantly fill space with words, which makes them an excellent listener. They know how to build rapport and completely understands others' needs and motivations due to his capacity for empathy and listening.
Yes, introverts can be highly effective leaders by leveraging their inherent strengths, such as active listening, empathy, creativity, and thoughtful, calculated decision-making. Unlike traditional portrayals, introverted leadership focuses on empowering teams, fostering innovation, and building deep connections, leading to greater collective success and creating psychologically safe environments.
However, they can be defined (in most cases) as positive role models and team players who often try to solve problems through collaboration, logical thought, and encouragement rather than aggression or dominance.
The four types of introverts are social, thinking, anxious, and restrained (or inhibited), as identified by psychologist Jonathan Cheek and colleagues. Social introverts prefer their own company or small groups, while thinking introverts are imaginative and introspective. Anxious introverts seek solitude due to shyness or social awkwardness, and restrained introverts tend to be cautious and reserved, taking time to open up.
Executive Springboard talent growth

Every workplace has untapped talent waiting for the right conditions to emerge. Sometimes it’s the analyst who quietly automates half their workload without telling anyone, or the customer service rep whose knack for pattern recognition could sharpen your entire sales strategy. The challenge isn’t that these people lack ambition—it’s that the systems around them don’t always notice, nurture, or reward their extra capacity. Company leaders and managers who learn to spot these overlooked strengths can dramatically improve team performance without adding headcount. Doing so means moving past assumptions, asking the right questions, and making intentional space for experimentation. When hidden potential meets the right opportunity, the results can reshape careers and strengthen the organization from the inside out.

Recognizing What’s Hiding in Plain Sight

Leaders who know how to spot the sparks others miss can change the trajectory of their teams. Often, the most capable people in the room are not the ones making the most noise. They might be quietly solving problems, turning in reliable work, and staying off the radar, their real capacity tucked away where it’s easy to overlook. Paying attention to those quiet team members feeling overlooked can reveal skills that aren’t showing up in the current job description. It’s not about pushing them into the spotlight against their will, but rather about creating a space where their talents can be noticed, valued, and given room to grow. The starting point is curiosity—asking what more they might want to do, and meaning it when you listen.

Using Tools to Remove Friction

Technology can play a part in unlocking capacity too. A manager looking to reduce friction in documentation and approvals might point their team toward resources that make the work faster without sacrificing quality. For example, if converting, editing, or sharing PDFs is slowing down project flow, this site may help by giving employees an easy, accessible way to handle those tasks. When the right tool meets a clear need, the productivity boost is immediate, and team members have more bandwidth to focus on higher-value contributions.

Discovering Interests Beyond the Job Description

The simplest way to find out what else someone can do is still to ask. Building trust and inviting team members to talk about what energizes them outside of their formal responsibilities can open the door to new possibilities. When leaders let employees share broader interests in a setting where that curiosity is taken seriously, it often leads to surprising alignments between personal passions and organizational goals. A side interest in data visualization, for example, might be exactly what’s needed to improve internal reporting. The insight doesn’t just benefit the individual—it strengthens the team’s collective range.

Opening New Career Paths

Sometimes, realizing someone’s potential means helping them reimagine their career entirely. A team member who has shown a sharp aptitude for systems thinking, data analysis, or digital security might benefit from further education that channels those strengths into a specialized field. If technology and protection of information spark their interest, they might decide to choose an IT degree track that builds the expertise needed for high-demand roles. Supporting these ambitions not only strengthens the individual’s career prospects but also enriches the organization’s long-term capabilities.

Putting Structure Around the Search for Skills

When you want to move from suspicion to certainty, structure helps. One of the clearest ways to see underutilization is to use a skills matrix to map capabilities across the team. This isn’t just a list of credentials; it’s a living document that captures strengths, side skills, and even budding interests that haven’t been put to work yet. By visualizing where skills overlap, where gaps exist, and where potential outstrips the current role, leaders can start thinking strategically about reassignments or new projects. The point isn’t to stretch people thin, but to give them opportunities that play to their best work and encourage them to take ownership of new territory.

Connecting Effort to Impact

For some employees, the disconnect isn’t that their skills are invisible—it’s that they’ve never been given specific, actionable feedback that links their actions to outcomes. A manager who can give feedback tied to visible impact helps team members understand why their contributions matter, and where their strengths are most valuable. This kind of feedback works best when it’s timely, tied to actual events, and specific enough to show a clear line between effort and effect. When people see how their work changes results, they’re more likely to step into new challenges with confidence.

Opening Doors with Short-Term Experiences

In other cases, you don’t uncover hidden abilities until someone gets to work in an unfamiliar environment. One way to make that happen without disrupting the organization is to introduce temporary cross-functional projects that run for just a few weeks or months. This can be done through internal talent marketplaces, short-term collaborations, or shadowing arrangements that expose people to new workflows. The experience often triggers fresh thinking for the employee and the teams they interact with, revealing skills that might never have emerged in a routine schedule.

Unlocking underutilized talent isn’t just a matter of efficiency—it’s about shaping an environment where people feel seen and valued for more than their current job title. Leaders who commit to noticing quiet strengths, structuring opportunities for growth, and creating space for personal passions often find that the payoff extends far beyond individual performance. The organization gains adaptability, depth, and resilience when its people are encouraged to stretch into new skills and perspectives. Even small shifts, like targeted feedback or short-term project rotations, can uncover capabilities that might otherwise remain hidden.
Executive Springboard leadership readiness

You might go through succession planning exercises, segmenting your talent into “ready now” or “wait 1-3 years,” etc. I’d like to provoke you to think about the “what if,” when a leadership position opens and the people in the succession plan are not immediately ready to take the helm. At first blush, the obvious solution is to go outside for leadership talent. That’s the path in over 70% of positions filled. If only it were so simple!

Look Before you Leap

Going outside involves a search, which can take six months to complete, at a cost of $100K. The newly hired candidate generally comes in at a salary that is 20% higher than what is typical of promoting internally. If the newly hired executive is male, and the internal candidate is female, you have a potential gender equity issue on hand.

Add the time it takes to get the newly hired executive up to speed and making the anticipated impact. A study by Egon Zehnder reported that 57% of new leaders felt they have very little impact before six months on the job; for 20%, it might take up to 9 months to make a significant contribution. And, on the way to creating an impact, the new executive needs to develop a sufficient understanding of the culture, peers, subordinates and the relationship with their superior to set themselves up for long-term success.

The risk of a failed executive hire from the outside is 50% in the first 18 months. It is far greater if the external hire is actually being promoted into this role, i.e., they do not have experience with this level of seniority before.

The hard costs associated with a failure include the initial search and a second search, comp and benefits for the time on the job and a severance package… all told, about 3 times salary. There are soft costs worth considering. Did this hire result in talent leaving the organization? Did the exec’s style lose business? What about management time involved in two searches, due diligence in a decision to terminate, legal costs, etc.? It’s easy for the soft costs of a failed hire to reach 10 times salary. So, if you are bringing in an executive at a salary of $300K, it is even money that things won’t work out and that this adventure can cost you up to $3M.

How about promoting the internal candidate who is not considered ready? There is no search and its associated costs, unless you run one simultaneously to considering internal choices. The internal promotion carries less risk from cultural misalignment, because there already is familiarity with your formal and informal processes. The familiarity with the customer base, the industry and other stakeholders are major advantages that the internal candidate has. And in an era of full employment, your competitors are interviewing those in your succession plan for equivalent positions to the one you have open!

Consider the Time to Impact

It seems to me that the comparison between the unknown executive from the outside and the not-quite-ready internal candidate misses a key component. Yes, your current employee may not be ready now, but how will they do a year from now, when you can expect the outside exec is beginning to make an impact? If you coached your inside option up, where might they be in six, nine or twelve months? If you have reason to believe they can be making a similar contribution, shouldn’t you consider a lower risk option?

Here is a graphic look at the options.

Internal promotion v external hires

The blue line represents an inexperienced internal promotion. The employee could be promoted and coached or coached prior to getting the promotion. In either case, they have a gradual improvement in impact, until they are meeting expectations around Month 8. Once they have reached an acceptable level of managerial competence, they can leverage their organizational knowledge and continue to grow.

The red lines show potential paths of an external hire. For six months, there is no impact, as you have a vacant position until they are hired. Once in, there is the learning curve per Egon Zehnder. At this point, I suggest three scenarios. The lower solid line, in about 50% of cases, has the external leader failing, either leaving the company or just limping along. Two other scenarios are more promising, with the external hire matching or surpassing the internally promoted leader. ​

The key takeaway from these scenarios is that an internal candidate is a better short-term choice and, as often as not, superior in the long run as well. A couple other variables:
  • (1) Hiring outside may lead your valued internal resource who is deemed not ready to seek opportunities elsewhere.
  • (2) An internal promotion can be a valuable reinforcement of organizational culture, demonstrating that your way of doing things leads to success. Hiring from the outside leaves junior team members wondering if there is anything they can do to get ahead.

When Buying Beats Building

I have stated my bias for home-grown solutions. There are times when an external hire is absolutely the right thing to do. Here are few of those situations, and the actions you might take:
  • (1) When you have no internal candidates who can be projected to perform adequately, even after a year or more of coaching. If something is too big a stretch, don’t contemplate it. But alarms should be going off to develop your bench strength. Don’t just name somebody as a potential successor. Put programs in place to prepare them for assuming the role.
  • (2) When you face a situation in which problems are better handled by a fresh perspective, or where the diversity that comes from an outside voice is worth the risk of failure. Hire somebody from the outside who can provide a different direction. But be sure to marry that selection with legacy knowledge, so new strategies can be activated smoothly.
  • (3) When there is a specific candidate outside of the organization who is known, familiar with current leaders, has experience in the vacant role and can be expected to make an accelerated impact. A new CEO will often bring in people they have worked with in the past. This may be the best way to get a new vision realized. But be careful not to overwhelm the culture with a Mafia from another company. A C-suite full of Googlers won’t replicate Google, but it might destroy your company’s own identity.
  • (4) It might be consistent with your culture to use external benchmarking for product quality, internal processes and talent selection. If your business units have freedom to buy from an outside vendor instead of from your own manufacturing, there is consistency with testing the market for talent. Even if there is a successor identified internally, the way the organization works might demand the due diligence of an external search. If an external candidate wins out, be true to your values and hire them.
It might be consistent with your culture to use external benchmarking for product quality, internal processes and talent selection. If your business units have freedom to buy from an outside vendor instead of from your own manufacturing, there is consistency with testing the market for talent. Even if there is a successor identified internally, the way the organization works might demand the due diligence of an external search. If an external candidate wins out, be true to your values and hire them.

A Closing Controversy

If you ask a team member to fill a leadership role for months and you are considering them for the position permanently, give them an interim title.

Even if you are conducting an external search, the interim title acknowledges your employee is under consideration for the position. It reflects the level of work they are doing. If they don’t get the big job, they revert to their former title, and it’s clear that you believe somebody else is more qualified.

Meanwhile, they will have the interim title on their resume, which makes them more marketable, inside or out. The value of that enhanced external marketability does not add to the risk of flight. Rather, it is an expression of the trust and value that you place in your employee, which can enhance retention.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

C-Suite Coaching is personalized mentorship designed specifically for senior executives, helping them enhance leadership skills, navigate complex business challenges, and maximize their impact within the organization.

We carefully assess each executive’s role, industry, and development needs, then pair them with a mentor from our network who has relevant experience and insight to provide tailored guidance.

Executives engage in confidential one-on-one sessions, usually bi-monthly, where they explore challenges, set goals, and receive actionable feedback. Mentors remain accessible for urgent support between sessions.

We use regular progress reviews and feedback from both executives and their organizations to track growth, adjust plans, and ensure coaching delivers meaningful leadership and business outcomes.

Executive Springboard leadership lessons

Executive Springboard mentor Peter Himmelman discusses his new book of poems and prayers and his thoughts on faith, loss, personal triumphs and wonder of the world around us. 

Executive Springboard mentoring leaders

Eighty-four percent of Fortune 500 companies have formal mentoring programs in place. All companies within the Fortune 50 have formal mentoring programs. And a recent LinkedIn Workplace Learning Report ranked mentoring as the top learning and development tool for career development. Clearly, the value of mentoring has become very well understood.

It’s expected that an organization’s senior managers will mentor their more junior colleagues. If we assume that we are all works in progress, even our senior leadership would benefit from mentoring, but it seldom happens in practice for two reasons: First, there is a few people of higher rank within the company to mentor a leader. Second, it’s difficult for senior people to make themselves vulnerable with a colleague, a necessary condition for professional growth.

Here are five alternatives to traditional internal mentoring for executives:

  • 1. Board members as mentors. They understand the organization and many the key players, and they provide the perspective of experienced business leaders. Their view of the operational elements and the time they can devote to executive mentoring may be limited. Some companies require mentoring as part of a board assignment.
  • 2. Reverse mentoring. When Hubert Jolie was CEO of Best Buy, he had a 20-something mentor who helped him understand the mindset of her generation and how it wanted to use technology. A newly hired executive might be paired with a junior manager in a two-way mentoring relationship, learning about the company while providing wisdom that comes from their experience outside the company. This type of mentoring has limitations for the leader, because it won’t necessarily provide the guidance that comes from a more experienced mentor.
  • 3. Buddy system. The Managing Director of the Dallas office of global enterprise might be paired with their counterpart in Toronto. They see the same kinds of problems, but their separation makes it more comfortable to share confidences. This is a mentorship of equals. Because there is little chance of buddies interacting in a business situation, there is not much risk that vulnerability will play a role in future power dynamics. The trick is to make sure buddies have sufficient common experiences and sufficient distance.
  • 4. Corporate alumni as mentors. Somebody who recently retired from the company’s C-suite can provide similar benefits of a board member with greater tactical understanding of the company. The opportunity to continue their contribution to the organization in retirement can be a huge motivator for the mentor, and they are likely to be more generous with their time than Directors or colleagues. The number of alumni willing to act as mentors may be insufficient to address all senior managers with a need.
  • 5. External resources. While executive coaches, peer circles or external mentors like Executive Springboard don’t provide the company-specific knowledge of other options, they often bring the greatest objectivity and greater expertise in providing executive guidance. External resources solve the supply-demand imbalance, and the professional nature of the relationship often translates into greater access than with people who see their mentor role as a sideline.
The art and science of mentoring

Contents:
Introduction and history: 0:00
Mentoring’s role in professional growth 9:45
Benefits of mentoring 22:50
How to start a mentoring program 41:55
Phases of mentorship relationships 1:02:50
Mentoring best practices 1:05:15
When mentoring fails 1:16: 37

Executive Springboard workplace fit

I see a growing number of people with VP of Belonging titles. And it gives me pause, because it creates a connection to Executive Springboard that I had not considered before. I want to talk about the process of fitting in.

I’ve lived in Minnesota for 25 years. I’ve never lost my East Coast accent. I never adopted “You betcha” as an expression. I tolerate the cold, but I don’t embrace it. In short, I’ve never fully become what my neighbors would call “one of us.” I’m OK with that and so are my neighbors, because I have reached the point of being accepted, while happily remaining who I am. At some point, though I won’t be mistaken for a native, I became sufficiently adapted to the culture.

It is nearly impossible to achieve your change agenda in a new role, if you don’t gain alignment from your stakeholders. That alignment requires adaptation to their style. Yet, authenticity is at the heart of leadership. You earn acceptance by acting in a way that is consistent with cultural norms while demonstrating that what you do in your own way adds value.

At Executive Springboard, we preach cultural agility and social awareness. We focus on how to create a successful fit, so that an executive in a new role can make a sustained impact. Here are two critical factors we consider:
  • (1) How to prove that you add value to your colleagues and the organization as a whole?
  • (2) How to win acceptance while maintaining who you are, or as Monica Diaz wrote in From Intent to Impact, how to affirm those things that differentiate you?
Now, let’s turn our gaze to organizations’ efforts to enhance diversity and to establish an inclusive culture.

Picture a White man joining a company in a Vice President role. The organization looks at him ambivalently. “Maybe he can bring needed change. Somebody saw enough positive in him to hire him here. But we have our doubts. He doesn’t know how we do things here. He may push for change where it’s not needed or wanted. He may have bullshitted his way in without the necessary competence. He might not even try to fit in.”

We have found that after about 8 months, following the correct strategies, this White male executive will progress to the point when he is no longer an outsider, when he is accepted, recognized as adding value and embraced as “one of us.”

The common language of onboarding is informative and tricky at the same time. We talk about integration and assimilation, the same language we use with immigrants. In a way, for some period of time, everybody in a new role is an immigrant, learning a new language, new relationships and new rules. The newly hired, promoted or reassigned executive starts their journey by being perceived as an outsider, different, threatening, having to prove themselves. Over time, they earn acceptance and recognition for their contributions to their team. All employees go through a similar process of shedding their newness and coming to belong.

Here is the tricky part. The word “assimilation” carries an unfortunate bias. It implies a process of turning the outsider into part of the prevailing culture, like Star Trek’s Capt. Picard becoming assimilated into the Borg, complete with changes to his very being. Inclusion’s end point is not this kind of absolute. Those you seek to attract will rightly reject this. Instead, the immigrant might have a goal of citizenship, holding the status and acceptance of belonging while continuing to embrace what makes them different.

Does the same 8-month journey of belonging hold true for a Latina or for a Black man? Is there an organizational bias that continues well beyond the point when the White man is accepted? Will visible minorities find themselves working harder to prove they belong? Does it ever end?

Suppose your company is like Tesla, recently reporting that Black and LatinX people together comprise less than 10% of its leadership positions. Suppose you’ve made a commitment to a more diverse leadership team, to a more inclusive environment. Suppose you are investing in talent acquisition efforts, to have your executive team better reflect your stakeholders. What are you doing to retain those people whom you’ve recruited?

As Professor Michael Gaffley told me, “Diversity is counting the numbers. Inclusion is making the numbers count.” The road to an inclusive culture goes in two directions. First, the organization has to become more willing to believe that outsiders have something to offer, that diverse backgrounds and opinions add to the richness of an organization and that its sense of corporate identity must move over time. In short, companies need to become humble. Whether you call it education, internal marketing or organizational transformation, this is the heavy lifting of DEI. It addresses a chronic condition.

In the second direction, those in the process of belonging need the tools that allow them to become culturally agile, the resilience to overcome the resistance they will face and the courage to remain who they are in the process. This condition is acute. People cannot wait for the social barriers they face to erode, in order to step over them. They need a pole to vault over the walls. People need support. They need examples, mentors and coaches, internal and external.

What does cultural agility entail? It means understanding the rhythm that the organization dances to. It means picking up nonverbal cues from colleagues and reading the unwritten playbook. The corporation’s values might be framed on a wall. The behaviors that are actually valued are another thing entirely; appropriate behavior can make the difference between success and failure. Cultural agility recognizes that the organization’s mores extend beyond the workplace to holiday parties, golf games or church attendance. Everybody learning their way steps out of rhythm from time to time. Sometimes people will do this intentionally because of who they are. Sometimes they just don’t recognize the rules. Everyone will pay a price for mistakes. Some people pay a steeper price than others. Or they are starting so far behind others that a misstep means they will never catch up.

Let me go out on a limb. If your company confuses onboarding with orientation, if it has a “sink or swim” approach to assimilating new employees, it doesn’t stand a chance at a successful commitment to DEI. If you cannot get a leader who looks like the rest of your executive group to feel part of the team, you are lost with visible minorities. If you don’t have a mechanism for explaining what is or is not appropriate, or for providing equal time in the penalty box, you are digging a moat rather than tearing down a wall. You need to create a path to citizenship for all of your immigrants or outsiders. And, in the long run, you might just find that you’ve redefined what “one of us” means.

I welcome your thoughts. And I offer my thanks to Joseph Grant, Darcie Murray, Gretchen Rawdon, Pamela Moret, Julio Ampuero, Ramon Gonzalez, Carole and Courtney Burton, Tracy Washington, Jote Taddese and Monica Diaz for your insights that have gotten this discussion going.