Workplace Bullying: Power, Leadership Abuse, and How to Respond

Workplace bullying and power dynamics in corporate leadership

I once reported to a CEO whom I considered a friend. But circumstances intruded that impacted our relationship. Our subsidiary came under the direction of a new executive, somebody who had been a mentor of mine but didn’t know my boss.

Their first get-together was planned at a rustic retreat over a weekend, with our entire executive team in attendance. My boss told me to bring a sleeping bag and expect to sleep on the floor. I resisted. I mentioned my bad back. I suggested that I could commute each day to the retreat. The next thing I knew, I was pushed against the wall. My CEO, red-faced, was screaming at me about how I was undermining him, going around his back to his new boss. I don’t believe I gave him a reason to believe any of this, but he felt threatened, and the big guy got physical.

I never said a word about the incident to him, HR or anybody else in the office. I just started counting down the days before my next assignment would start. And so did he, reminding me repeatedly in front of my peers that I would not be around to see an initiative through, or that the “office spy” would be gone in a matter of months.

Workplace Bullying Statistics and Reality

Physical bullying is pretty rare in the corporate world. But the Workplace Bullying and Trauma Institute published the results of a study in 2017 that showed just how commonplace bullying is. Here are some highlights:

  • 61% of Americans have been bullied in the workplace, have witnessed bullying there or are aware of it.
  • 61% of bullies are bosses.
  • Women are more often bullied than men; Hispanics are more often bullied than other ethnic groups.
  • 45% of Americans believe companies, informed of a bullying boss, won’t do anything about it.
  • 39% of targets of bullying suffer anxiety, panic attacks or depression.
  • 29% of bullied employees never say anything about their experience, and 65% leave their companies.

Roots of Workplace Bullying

At its roots, bullying is about how and why power is applied. In physics, power is a measure of energy transfer. In organizations, power is the ability to direct people’s energy to cause change. Nothing gets accomplished without the use of power. In companies, people are granted power typically because of their expertise, accomplishments, tenure, position in the hierarchy, connections, etc.

What people do with their power can vary. We hope it might be with an objective of accomplishing something good for the organization. But power can also be used for the benefit of that person in power. And when the objective is to accrue more power, when the balance of power in a relationship is made even more uneven, bad stuff happens.

The Workplace Bullying Institute (WBI) defines bullying at work as “repeated, health-harming mistreatment of a person by one or more perpetrators. It is abusive conduct that is threatening, humiliating, or intimidating, or work interference or sabotage which prevents work from getting done, or verbal abuse.”

Workplace bullying is often in the form of intimidation, insults, being ignored or talked over in meetings, having your mistakes publicized, your efforts undermined or credit for your achievements attributed to somebody else. Again, from the WBI, “it is driven by the bully’s … need to control the targeted individual.” The power relationship is unbalanced to begin with, and the person with the power acts to maintain or increase the imbalance.

Power and Leadership Behavior

Robert Sutton, author of The Asshole Survival Guide: How to Deal with People Who Treat You Like Dirt notes that the risk of bullying increases as people climb higher in the hierarchy. He points to research showing “that being and feeling powerful provokes people to focus more on their own needs and wants, and to become oblivious to others’ needs and feelings. And as we all know, sh*t rolls downhill.”

Maybe the act of bullying is all about feeling like you have the power, to feel control over another, whether it’s real or not. My CEO worried that the power in our relationship was flipping, and his “flight or fight” response to the threat was to assert physical dominance. I submitted. He was bigger and stronger than I was. And he was my boss. But in the hangover after his action, he must have realized that it made no difference in my relationship with his boss. Maybe he hoped that I was making an implicit concession, that he was coercing me not to take advantage of my close ties with my mentor. Unfortunately, it came at the cost of a previously healthy manager-subordinate relationship.

What to Do If You’re Bullied at Work

Remember that bullying may not be illegal unless it includes a threat of physical harm (assault or stalking), affects somebody of protected status (discrimination) or creates what a reasonable person would consider a hostile work environment. Taking legal action may require that you file a report within 180 days of an incident, which means making a decision on what to do with some urgency.

A lot of literature talks about the actions employees can take to deal with bullying. Here are steps you can take to avoid remaining a target:

  • Keep your cool. Escalating emotion may temporarily throw a bully off balance, but you risk a crushing reply.
  • Confront the bully with their behavior, explain how it feels on your end and set consequences that compel respect. Fordham organizational psychology professor Paul Baard suggests quickly and directly saying, “I don’t want to be spoken to that way. Cut it out!”

You probably won’t feel comfortable making this a face-to-face conversation, and that’s OK. An email provides both communication and documentation. Be careful to write with an assumption of positive intent: “I am not sure that you meant to be demeaning, but publicly criticizing my work in a rather personal way like you did is not a good way to get my cooperation.” Be prepared for a response that focuses on a difference of opinion on management style rather than an acknowledgement of bullying. You will not likely win in this exchange, but you serve notice.

  • Change the power equation. Make it about more than just about you, because a bully seldom just picks on one person. Bring in others to your side who are having the same issue, multiplying the credibility of your arguments. More risky actions are to ally with somebody who has more power than the bully or, if the bullying regularly occurs in public, to shame the thug publicly for punching down.
  • Eliminate power as the relationship’s defining characteristic. Call out the behavior and refuse to play the game. Suggest a more constructive relationship based on collaboration, or at least that the bully will get a more satisfactory reaction from somebody who doesn’t realize what’s going on.
  • Ignore and deflect. Give no reaction, with the expectation that the bully will lose interest.

It’s Not Just About You

  • While the results of these tactics may be stop you from being bullied, they are not likely to end the bully’s behavior. He or she will probably just move on to somebody else. Trying to end the bullying behavior takes a different approach. Build a case. Just like James Comey reported, take contemporaneous notes and keep them in a journal. Here is where the well-timed email about an abusive event is important. Encourage colleagues in the same situation to keep notes, too. A single episode will be dismissed. But notes of repeated misbehavior following attempts by you and others to address it may be too compelling to ignore.
  • Present your documentation and that of colleagues. The question is, “To whom?” HR is the obvious choice, especially if your company has an ombudsman program. But it is not always the best choice. Human Resources has a mandate to protect the employer. Our news is replete with headlines of people in power who have abused their station for years, whose organizations knew about it and turned a blind eye. If your bully is a senior officer, the headwinds you feel are likely felt by HR as well.


WBI’s Gary Namie suggests going to a senior employee who is not the bully’s ally with the business case. An executive’s abusive action is turning four employees into flight risks, increasing absenteeism, impacting productivity and potentially creating a legal liability. All of these have costs to the company which can be estimated. All can go away with acknowledgement of the issue and corrective action.

Don’t settle for, “I’ll look into this.” Get a commitment on what action you can expect. Will somebody talk to the perpetrator? Will they seek a commitment to address behavior? How will you learn about next steps? Are there disciplinary action that could result from repeated abusive behavior? Is there anything that can be done to ensure your job status is unaffected?

And If Nothing Works?

Attacking bullying, particularly by senior people, is attacking the prevailing power structure. Sometimes, bullying might just have been bad management, where an individual is not aware of how their actions impact others until they are pointed out. Sometimes, bullies are shamed or threatened into changing their ways. But many times, change is not in the cards. What then?

  • Get counsel. Knowing your legal rights is important, not just as a victim of abuse of power but as a potential whistleblower. If you are among the 2/5 of bullied employees who deal with anxiety or panic as a result, talk to a professional.
  • Get out. If you find yourself the object of continued attacks, if your attempts to fix the problem are stonewalled, if you find your physical or emotional health suffering, why stay in this kind of environment? Not all organizations operate like this. Find one where you feel power is used constructively to build positive change for the organization.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Workplace bullying is repeated, harmful mistreatment such as intimidation, humiliation, verbal abuse, or actions that interfere with an employee’s ability to work effectively.

Bullying often stems from misuse of power, where individuals in authority seek control, reinforce dominance, or respond to perceived threats in the workplace.
Signs include public criticism, being ignored in meetings, having work undermined, credit being taken by others, and consistent negative or intimidating behavior.

Employees should stay calm, document incidents, address the behavior when possible, seek support from colleagues or leadership, and consider escalation if the behavior continues.

External change leadership transition mentoring support

Almost any time an executive joins a new company, there is a mandate to change things. CEOs or VPs are seldom told, “Keep us on the same path we’ve been traveling.” Sometimes you hear, “We want you to be a change agent.” Other times it is specific: “We cannot continue to lose share on the most important part of our portfolio!” Sometimes, it’s just implied, like when a person with a strong sales background takes over for somebody with an operations bent.

There is an interesting rationale to hiring you to a senior position. My friend Richard Henry, President of RAH Content, refers to this as the tyranny of the unknown. Companies will assume that the person on the outside is more capable of implementing needed change than people on the inside. They have an unblemished record. Maybe nobody inside is ready for a senior role. Maybe it is thought that the way things have been done is not a recipe for future success, and that it takes people who have succeeded with another strategy to move the organization ahead. Maybe it that internal people’s growth is not recognized, and they continue to be viewed in the same light as when they were hired.

Here is the truth behind the change you are responsible for implementing…

If you are hired into a company as a new executive, you don’t know how ANYTHING gets done in the organization. You don’t know processes. You don’t know culture. You may have a strategy, but in a 2013 Katzenbach Center study, it was shown that 64% of global senior executives saw culture as more critical to the success of change management than strategy or operating model.

Maybe you’ll invest time to learn how things work. Maybe you’ll rely on the people who do know how to get things done, as you figure out what to direct them to do.

How, then, can you possibly make change happen quickly? Let me offer five strategies:


Plan your work and work your 90-day plan

Any executive taking on a new role should develop a 90-day plan. Build in your understanding of the company and environment, based on your research. Clarify your vision for success. Lay out what progress can you realistically make in that first quarter. What are the components of your action plan? What resources do you have to draw upon or acquire? What barriers are anticipated, and how can they be overcome? What quick wins can be accomplished, to demonstrate progress and to build relationships?

If you are being recruited for the position, share the plan with colleagues in your last round of interviews. It shows you have taken the job seriously, that you have projected yourself into the role that you seek and that you can show a path to accomplish things.

Why do companies focus on the first 90 days? Because, by Day 90, if there are red flags about you, many people expect they will show up. The honeymoon is over. There can be tangible evidence of your ability to deliver. You have enough exposure within the organization for a consensus about you to begin to form.

The first 90 days plan is the equivalent of a coach who scripts out the first ten plays or so in a football game. It doesn’t indicate whether or not you will win, but it does establish the game plan.

A critical component of the 90-day plan is establishing relationships with the people who will help make change happen. Some might be directly involved in implementing the change. Others just have to keep out of the way!

It is unrealistic to accomplish the change you seek to make in 90 days. A company would hire a consultant to do that, not an executive. Accompanying the details of the first 90 days might be extended goals for the significant change you seek.


Be ready to scuttle part or all of that plan on Day 1

You build the plan based on previous experience. But the laws of physics that worked for you in your past life might not hold in the new universe you face.

Remember that your plan is a guess at what will work. When you run into the reality of your new situation, you must be quick to adapt.

An environment may be more or less responsive to actions than you reckoned. Assumptions of available resources might prove inaccurate. Deadlines might have to change. Process might have to be rewired. Expectations often change dramatically once you walk in the door.

A colleague joined a hotel chain with a brief to introduce brand management throughout the organization. Once employed, he learned that authority from P&L to customer needs was wielded at the unit level. There was no easy short-term way to inject a centralized concept of branding.

Get key people onboard

Medical marketers pay careful attention to key opinion leaders (KOLs), usually physicians whose written or verbal recommendations carry influence with others in their profession.

You will find key opinion leaders in your company, and not necessarily where you’d expect when you look at an org chart.

Key opinion leaders often are at the confluence of several groups of interaction. They are hubs of communication. Watch what happens in an audience when a KOL reacts to a leader’s comments. Does the room react to their nods of agreement, crossed arms or rolled eyes? These people are worth cultivating.

Once they are identified, ask KOLs for their opinions. Not only do you get useful feedback, but the KOLs begin to feel invested in your course of action. They feel heard. They can become powerful ambassadors for your initiatives. And it is far more effective to use these people to influence dissenters than, as the new person, to win dissenters over yourself.

Tap into legacy

If you can make a link from where the organization has been to where you are going, it is easier to bring people along.

To quote Bruce Weindruch in Start with the Future and Work Back: A Heritage Management Manifesto, “Once you know where you want to go, the value of harnessing your history becomes immeasurable.“

Lots of organizations create awards that reinforce desired performance. A few wise people name these awards after legendary executives in the company’s past. In this way, employees see how somebody long-revered epitomized a particular behavior that is currently valued.

People respond positively to a change that is framed as a reversion to core values held since the mythic beginning or in “glory days.”

Understand the value of your ignorance

Being new allows you to ask naïve questions that can cast light on unnecessary paradigms. Why are things done the way they are? Why are these people involved in a process? Is the assessment of risk from an action accurate? Was the way you’ve succeeded in the past ever tried here?

In the early days, it is easy to believe that these questions are not asked because you have an agenda, but because you really want to learn how things work.

Being new allows you to break norms. Maybe experiments can be tried that might not be approved otherwise. Maybe shortcuts in process can be explored. Apologies might be required when the rule-breaking becomes apparent. But as former Rear Admiral Grace Hopper said, “It is easier to beg forgiveness than to ask permission.”

Being new allows you to seek opinions of employees and to aggregate them into arguments for a course of action. In this way, you do not provide your opinion of a direction to be taken, but instead you offer your summation of the experiences and opinions of the organization at large.

Employees will cut you some slack on your ignorance of process, if you can compensate by demonstrating your competence in other areas that matter to them. Use your functional expertise to coach others. Use your management skills to achieve goals through other people.

Common Pitfalls When Driving Organizational Change

All well and good so far. But before you climb on board a steamroller and flatten everything in your path, let’s consider four things that can go wrong along the way.

Alienation

Leadership determined that your outside experience and competencies are better suited to affect change than the people inside the organization. How does this make those people inside the organization, those whom you will call on to execute your plan, feel?

Mainly, that their talents, process, experience or judgment are seen as inferior to your own.

Diplomacy is critical. Build up their esteem by giving credit to their strengths. Highlight the team’s successes to date and suggest how to invest in their continuation. Underline their critical role going forward. Figure out what’s in it for them, as it relates to the change ahead.

People don’t need to see their input put into action. They just need to feel part of the process.


Lack of alignment

A former Wells Fargo executive with a strong sales background replaced an Operations person as CEO of a small Upper Midwest bank system.

He announced dozens of changes in his first two years – closing kiosks in grocery stores, launching apps, experimenting with video banking, etc. But he observed that the organization picked and chose which initiative to get behind.

What was missing was an overarching CHANGE.

If people understand the CHANGE, there is a better chance they’ll sign up for the changes. Alignment can come from clearly articulating a vision rather than focusing on individual changes.


Not delivering to expectations

Every leader gets a pass to adjust their thinking about objectives in the early learning phase.

But two actions are not easily forgiven:

  • Failing to deliver against an objective that has not been adjusted
  • Making incremental adjustments instead of addressing reality upfront

Delivering bad news once lets people adjust. Continually pushing back deadlines damages credibility.

Unforeseen consequences

Even when goals are achieved, unintended outcomes may occur:

  • Customer satisfaction suffers
  • Employee turnover increases
  • Operational strain limits opportunities

It is easy to lose perspective. Important questions must still be asked:

  • Are we doing the right thing?
  • Are there better alternatives?
  • What trade-offs are we creating?

Conclusion: Balancing Change, Culture, and Leadership Success

In summary, a new leader coming from outside the organization is bound to be a source of change, if for no other reason than being ignorant of how things have been done.

But usually, the reason you are hired is because of the change you can impact. Care must be taken to get alignment with the people who will help you deliver change, to provide the big picture in your direction and to be flexible enough to communicate the course corrections you have to make.

Remember that the urgency of an immediate task needs to be balanced with the longer-term goals that will determine your ultimate success.

Feel free to connect with the Executive Springboard for Executive Leadership Development

 

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

External hires come with high costs, longer onboarding time, and a significant failure rate. They may also disrupt team dynamics and lack the institutional knowledge that internal candidates already possess.

Companies often seek fresh perspectives, new skills, or solutions to complex challenges that internal candidates may not yet be ready to handle. External hiring can also align with a strategy of bringing in diverse thinking.

Passing over internal candidates can affect morale, retention, and trust within the organization. It may create frustration among employees and weaken engagement if not managed carefully.

Organizations should evaluate whether internal candidates can be developed through coaching or mentoring. Investing in internal talent often reduces risk, builds loyalty, and strengthens long-term leadership pipelines.

Professional executive meeting with new boss discussing goals and leadership alignment

The courtship of a C-suite executive for a position in a company is a prolonged ordeal. Three to six months is pretty common. Even without the usual starts and stops in the process, the executive meets a variety of people potential peers, perhaps senior direct reports, and board members. In my last placement as a Chief Marketing Officer, I met with the CEO at least three times before receiving an offer, including extensive one-on-one sessions in his office and over dinner.

From Recruitment to Reality: Working with a CEO

Once an offer is accepted, you move from “engagement” to “marriage.” The selling stops on both sides, and both you and the organization live with the realities that you face. And the most important reality you face is found in the relationship you have with your new boss, the CEO. Very early on in your tenure, the two of you need to establish how you will work together.

What to Cover in Your First Meeting with the CEO

What, then, should get covered in an early meeting with the boss? A search of literature provides a dizzying array of options. Try “9 Questions to Ask Your New Boss,” “15 Ways to Impress Your Boss on Day 1” or “15 Ways to Make Your One-on-Ones Worth Your While.” There are 39 tactics to try in only three articles! I canvassed my LinkedIn network for a more manageable list of topics for this initial conversation. Because, who can find time to impress a CEO 15 ways on Day 1, much less remember 15 ways to impress? At a senior level and having just accepted a position, impressing the boss, even an intimidating one, is less important than establishing a good working relationship.

So, with help from my friends, here are five things to remember in the first meeting(s) with the CEO as your boss.

1. Communications

Amy Breidenbach Green noted the importance of understanding the CEO’s preferred communications style and methods. Do they prefer email, text or face-to-face? How often can you expect to connect with them? If you really have to get an important message for them, how should you send the Bat Signal? Is there a way to immediately short-cut their assistant if necessary? How do they respond to calls at night or over weekends? How or when do they typically provide feedback to their reports, and how can you provide feedback to them? How do they prefer to hear bad news? OK, it is becoming easier to see how there are a lot of questions to ask Day 1!

2. Scope of Responsibilities

Bob Foht used what he called “DO TELL ASK” when he spoke to the owners of GearGrid, after joining the company as CEO. To establish the extent of his responsibilities, he sought clarification on what he could just do without reporting it, what actions should he tell the owners about after the fact and what steps required that he ask permission before taking. In essence this is a simplified RACI.

DO TELL ASK is where potential disconnects can arise between your expectations of autonomy and the CEO’s need to keep on top of the business. It’s likely that nobody has asked this of the CEO before, so the “rules” are being made up on the fly. Consider this a starting point in your relationship; over time, things in the ASK pile might move to TELL. Much of the literature on early interactions with bosses suggest asking about management style. I agree how important understanding management style can be. But asking about scope of responsibilities and communications can address the same thing in a more granular way.

3. Understanding the Priorities of the Moment

You, no doubt, are familiar with the corporate vision and other public statements of strategic objectives. By the time you sit down with the CEO, you are probably up to speed on corporate priorities. But what is important may deviate from what is urgent, and urgency might win out, in the moment you join the leadership team. These urgent matters are not often talked about with outsiders, so you might come on board completely ignorant of what is taking the leadership team’s energy and time. Are there crises that are taking the C-suite’s attention away from your direct responsibilities? What priorities have been dropped to create capacity to handle a crisis? Are there problems within your area of responsibility that need immediate attention? Are there looming issues on the CEOs mind that you, too, can be thinking about?

4. The CEO’s Expectations of You

Somehow, even indirectly, the urgent issues raised will impact you. What does the CEO want from you? Should you be patient that they cannot spend time with you, while they address other issues? Can you collaborate with a colleague and produce what Michael Watkins calls a “quick win?” Do they believe you have experience in a similar situation, which can put you in the role of advisor?

The same questions stand for the long-term priorities how can play a role in helping the CEO achieve their goals, even those that don’t seem to directly involve you? You impressed the organization enough through the recruitment process to get this position; what were the strengths they saw in you that you can leverage immediately? How can your ignorance of how things get done be used to the organization’s advantage? Are there things that the “newbie” can say that would be more difficult for those who are entrenched?

5. Creating a Personal Rapport

When I asked Pat Anderson about his experiences getting to know his CEO, he turned the issue around, thinking about what he likes to do in early meetings with his own subordinates. At the top of his list was getting to know people as people.

It strikes me that a CEO will do the same thing in their initial meetings with you. Be open to sharing personal information that would not have come out in your interviews. Talking about your family or your interests, sharing a book or article you recently read or talking about house hunting if you’re hiring involves a move will provide a glimpse of you outside of the office. And this helps to build trust.

Building Trust with Your CEO from Day One

The power dynamics of your relationship makes it difficult for you to overtly take the lead, asking personal questions of the CEO that you don’t know the answers to. It is fair game to volunteer information about yourself in an appropriate setting. If there is a public way of knowing something about the CEO where they went to school, non-profits they are associated with, etc., these can be avenues to build a personal bond.

Connect with the us for assistance with executive mentoring.

 

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

C-suite executives should focus on understanding the new boss’s vision, expectations, and leadership style while clearly communicating their own priorities and current business challenges.

Alignment ensures both the executive and the new boss share common goals, reducing misunderstandings and enabling faster, more effective decision-making.

Important topics include strategic priorities, performance expectations, communication preferences, key risks, and immediate opportunities for impact.

Trust can be built through transparency, active listening, clear communication, and demonstrating accountability for results and team performance.

Passed Over and Pissed Off in Leadership Roles

Mia Mulrennan is Chief Talent Officer for Edmentium. Prior to that, she was a consultant focusing on measuring customer-centricity among employees. Her book, Passed Over and Pissed Off, does a great job of addressing the sandwiched Generation X, which often sees leadership opportunities bypassed as Boomers transition directly to Millennials.

I’ve found a more micro application of being passed over and pissed off. Almost every time an executive (let’s call her Rene) finds herself in a new position, there is another person (Lars) who was passed over. Most of the time, there is a Lars who is internally situated. He is respected for his tenure and his institutional knowledge. He is a valuable asset because he knows how to get things done. And often Lars is the biggest management challenge Rene initially faces. The greater Lars’s expectation of getting Rene’s position, the harder this dilemma is.

The Psychological Impact of Being Passed Over

It is human nature for Lars to view Rene as the manifestation of his own personal failure in not getting the big job. It is a blow to his ego. And it is hard to avoid a skepticism about why the new boss was a better choice. It’s easy to imagine that the decision reflects the tyranny of the unknown, a bias that somebody from the outside is viewed as superior to the more familiar. To make matters worse, Lars seldom gets an explanation for the choice. He shifts into “prove it” mode, judging Rene’s first tentative actions and questioning her motivations in a way that is usually damaging to the new relationship.

Decisions, Decisions!

Many new executives will hope there is no problem, or that any attitude problem from Lars improves on its own without making an issue of it. But hope is not a strategy. While Rene will be seen as the organization’s leader, he is perhaps the culture’s key influencer. If Lars undermines Rene, even unintentionally, she has a lot to clean-up among her broader team. I believe Rene should talk it out with Lars early on. In a one-on-one discussion, she can recognize his value to her and acknowledge that her presence is not the outcome he might have wanted. She must make clear that she is the boss, not a colleague. Rene should clarify the authority and autonomy that Lars is granted. And she must offer him the choice of getting on board as a willing contributor or getting help in an exit.
Lars may deny that an issue exists. In response, Rene can offer evidence she has observed or just point out how normal it is for there to be hurt or resentment and how difficult that can be for the team’s effectiveness.

Building Respect Through Honest Leadership

The honesty of this approach is bound to impact Lars. He begins to realize how his internalizing the situation can affect things beyond himself. The option of an exit may be a shock or a welcome avenue. At a minimum, Rene gains respect from Lars by treating him like a grown-up and for establishing a context that is bigger than either of them. That tough conversation between Rene and Lars will not be a one-shot deal. Passed over managers who make a commitment to stay usually do so when they have something to call their own.
That is where the granting of some authority to Lars is important. Rene probably has bigger performance issues than Lars, however Ronald Reagan’s “Trust but verify” dictum is good advice. Lars will remain Rene’s biggest attitude issue for a while. This can impact the outcomes within his responsibility or it can leach out into the attitudes of the team towards Rene. She must remain vigilant and call out to Lars what she sees.

Denouement

Sometime in our careers, and probably more times than we’d care to count, we have been pissed off about being passed over. But when you are the Rene doing the passing over, it might be easy to forget that there is usually an impacted Lars somewhere on your team. You might wish to avoid the direct personal confrontation with Lars. But there is a much broader constituency of team members who are depending on you getting your relationship with Lars on the right footing.
Leaving the Lars situation unaddressed avoids a face-to-face conflict short term.

Long-term, it leads to metastasis. Being Rene requires addressing the situation early and staying vigilant for the longer term. Done correctly, even if you lose a talented lieutenant in the process, you establish your position as a leader, define the values that will guide your work and create the underpinnings for a stronger team.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Employees often see being passed over as a personal failure, which can hurt their ego and create skepticism toward the new leader. This emotional response can lead to resistance and strained working relationships.

A new leader should address the situation early through a direct one-on-one conversation, acknowledge the employee’s value, clarify roles and authority, and set clear expectations moving forward.
Ignoring the issue can lead to long-term problems, including team dysfunction, reduced morale, and subtle undermining of leadership, which can spread negativity across the organization.

Leaders can rebuild trust by being honest, granting meaningful responsibility, maintaining open communication, and consistently reinforcing expectations while monitoring performance.

    Need Any Help?